tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9045565.post114034760501600553..comments2023-09-30T03:57:11.799-05:00Comments on ahistoricality: Good news/Bad newsAhistoricalityhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04004964192885891003noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9045565.post-1141297877428013102006-03-02T06:11:00.000-05:002006-03-02T06:11:00.000-05:00Aw, come on. You really think GWB has the vocabul...Aw, come on. You really think GWB has the vocabulary or attention span for Clancy? Crichton is a far easier read. <BR/><BR/>Couldn't resist the cheap shot...Kimberlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09038624714431918411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9045565.post-1140407922561288262006-02-19T22:58:00.000-05:002006-02-19T22:58:00.000-05:00It's the aim part that T.C. at least gets. As in R...It's the <I>aim</I> part that T.C. at least gets. As in Ready - aim - fire, whereas the neo-cons believe that if <A HREF="http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/killbill/dontletmebemisunderstood.htm" REL="nofollow">you're just a soul who's intentions are good</A>, the aiming part is unneccesary.Poohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10088628100700088755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9045565.post-1140399555784246562006-02-19T20:39:00.000-05:002006-02-19T20:39:00.000-05:00Hmmm. I've read at least a half dozen Clancy works...Hmmm. I've read at least a half dozen Clancy works, and I'm not really sure that his view of policy <I>solutions</I> -- the bad guys have <I>a</I> weakness that can be shot or blown up, if your heart is in the right place -- is really any more nuanced than Crichton's science.Ahistoricalityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04004964192885891003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9045565.post-1140387085385297232006-02-19T17:11:00.000-05:002006-02-19T17:11:00.000-05:00As a devotee, Clancy has a far more nuanced view o...As a devotee, Clancy has a <I>far</I> more nuanced view of foreign policy than do the neocons.Poohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10088628100700088755noreply@blogger.com