Now, though, comes the reporting of Sydney H. Schanberg which marshals considerable evidence that
- a substantial number of POWs -- hundreds -- were not returned by the Vietnamese and their allies after the signing of the 1973 Paris Accords
- Nixon's administration, and subsequent ones, were aware that these soldiers, sailors and airmen were in Vietnamese hands, but felt they lacked the leverage to get them free
- Every administration since Nixon has hewed to the line that no US POWs existed, suppressing and distorting evidence, or simply refusing to look for it
- John McCain was an active participant in the process of marginalizing those families and investigators who believed in the existence of these abandoned POWs
I'm disgusted. In order to appear strong, the US abandoned its own code of military honor, the willingness to search for truth, democratic process. In order to gain some financial leverage, the Vietnamese government held -- and ultimately executed, most likely -- hundreds of men who had every right to be returned to their homeland. It's a violation of international law, and I know that holds little water for some, but I take it seriously: it's the bare minimum code of ethics which is supposed to keep atrocities like this at bay.
So, I'm officially revising my view of the world: the POW/MIA Flag is a memorial to a real, legitimate atrocity, an international shame.
But my worldview revision is relatively minor compared to the stripped mental gears which are going to come from those who consider McCain a "hero" for his time served and believe that he has the best interests of Americans -- civilians or military -- at heart.
This is an interesting posting and one I had not seen before, despite a significant amount of study on this subject. It is important to note that this meme of "hundreds of men were not returned" is an Article of Faith among the far, far right loonies.
I've long felt that this site: MIA Facts Site has been the most balanced I've read on this subject.
Full Disclosure I have shared some of my own research and personal knowledge of these matters from my own experience, with the site’s author, Joe Schlatter.
Joe is an interesting character. He is a strong liberal democrat and card-carrying, 32nd degree, fanatical Bush hater. As such, he is diametrically opposed politically to the POW-MIA cultists whom he calls "True Believers." These cats are even to the right of Bush and that’s hard … they’re so far right they’re damn near off the spectrum.
But, paradoxically, Joe, in his arguments against George Bush, employs some of the same outrageous and unsound logic common to those infected with Bush Derangement Syndrome, and for which he criticizes the POW-MIA “True Believers.” Pot, meet Kettle.
Notwithstanding that, I see on his site that Joe has issued a shock and awe attack on the True Believers who have been re-enegized by McCain's candidacy, and have dusted off all of their old scurrilous lies about McCain. Apparently, Schlatter has not seen the article you referenced in your posting, but I recognize some of the same old tired arguments in that piece that Schlatter has debunked on his site.
His site is lengthy, wordy, and sometimes difficult to follow but, in my view, his work has been quite thorough and sound; not up to the standard of a top-rate historical monograph, mind you, but good.
I’d urge anyone interested to check out Schlatter’s site.
I scored a 6 on the Privilege Test
Does that mean I'm fucked?
Post a Comment